Skip to content

Zero Carbon Charge Objects to SANRAL’s EV Charging Policy Changes

Share

Zero Carbon Charge Objects to SANRAL’s EV Charging Policy Changes

Theinfoportal

Published
Share

Zero Carbon Charge, an electric vehicle charging station developer, has formally objected to proposed changes in the South African National Roads Agency’s (SANRAL) Rest and Service Facilities (RSF) policy. These amendments target EV charging developers, roadside businesses like filling stations, and road users. The objection comes at a key time for South Africa’s shift to electric mobility, as it could slow down vital infrastructure growth. Charge raised the issue in a statement and through an interview on The Money Show.

Charge submitted its objection to highlight risks to private investment. The proposed policy changes would impose levies on businesses within 60 meters of the road reserve or 500 meters of interchanges. These include 5-7% on all services and 2-3% on energy sold, adding up to a 10% combined fee.

Joubert Roux, Charge’s co-founder and director of operations, spoke on The Money Show. He said SANRAL is “weaponising” its control over roads. Roux added that “sweating their assets” means higher costs for every road user.

Subscribe for updates

Get new posts, insights, and occasional updates delivered to your inbox.

We respect your privacy.

SANRAL manages national roads, their construction, and safety. Its RSF policy sets rules for rest areas and services along these routes. A court ordered public roadshows for input on the changes.

The roadshows followed legal pressure for public participation. They affect all roadside operators, not just EV chargers. SANRAL turned down an interview request. The agency is waiting for a final report from the roadshows.

Charge lists several core objections to the policy. It claims SANRAL goes beyond its powers under the SANRAL Act. The changes touch land use planning, environmental rules, and market setup.

Charge sees regulatory overreach that could face review under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act (PAJA). SANRAL would act as regulator, planner, and competitor, creating a conflict of interest.

The policy raises investor worries with backward-looking rules and loose approvals. This could delay projects and break investor trust. Charge also flags risks to the Competition Act.

Roadshows continue as part of the review process. SANRAL awaits the final report before next steps. Charge’s points could lead to legal challenges.

An audio interview with Roux is available on The Money Show for full details.

Posted in: SA NEWS

Related Posts

Conversation

0 Comments

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *